Cyber Risk Brief
Three pages, quarterly. How large the exposure is, which way it moved, and what the last budget bought.
Read what the board sees →DeRISK CRQ
You can name every vulnerability in your plant — but not which one costs you most. DeRISK CRQ quantifies expected loss per facility, ranks remediation by savings, and gives your board a figure underwriters accept.
Expected annual loss
Portfolio after fixes
$8.3M → $6.8M
↓18.2% expected annual loss
Portfolio tail risk
$31M 1-in-100 year loss
Top fixes
60+
facilities quantified in the portfolio
18.2%
less expected annual loss
$1.4M
saved every year
$6.4M
less insured limit
Each facility is quantified on its own rather than averaged across the portfolio. When your sites share OT network data (Level 4 Evidence-Grade), DeRISK builds each facility’s OT topology from it: IDS, firewall or SIEM feeds, or network diagrams.
Quantification runs on FAIR and FAIR-MAM, the standards risk teams and insurers already work to, extended for industrial environments by the DeRISK Consequence Model.
A 50-question instrument scores control posture at company and facility level, offered in the DeRISK Control Model, NIST SP 800-82r3 or IEC 62443.
From Level 3 Board-Grade, the same figure arrives framed for each person who has to act on it, so nobody is left translating an engineering report into a budget case.
Each agent does one job and hands the result to the next. Nothing is re-entered, and every figure traces back to the agent that produced it.
See DeRISK CRQ in action
How the agents turn your data into a number in dollars.
Three pages, quarterly. How large the exposure is, which way it moved, and what the last budget bought.
Read what the board sees →Six pages, monthly. Where risk enters, which controls are weakest, and which projects pay back fastest.
Read the posture report →Four pages, quarterly. Expected and tail exposure in financial terms, and whether the CapEx clears your hurdle.
Read the exposure report →Four pages, monthly. Which sites carry the risk, how many production days are exposed, and in what order to fix them.
Read the resilience report →Five pages, at renewal. What you hand the broker to prove risk quality, size the layers and argue the premium.
Read the evidence bundle →Five levels of input depth, and five premium capabilities that attach to them.
Level 1
A defensible number before you commit anything.
Level 2
Fewer than ten questions, no formal assessment.
Level 3
No OT telemetry needed, like around 80% of sites.
Level 4
For sites that already share OT network data.
Level 5
Down to the zone and conduit, for sites with full OT visibility.
Attach to Level 3 Board-Grade or Level 4 Evidence-Grade. Click an add-on to open it.
Ask DeRISK. Davy answers.
Ask about your own CRQ results in plain words.
Works across
and DeRISK Threat Intelligence
Next-best projects, in order, in less than one hour.
The next-best projects, in order, in less than one hour.
Expert judgment, encoded across
Test a control before you fund it.
Price a control change before you fund it.
Four scenario dimensions
Premium OT feeds, bundled by DeNexus.
Premium OT threat feeds, bundled by DeNexus.
The feeds you already pay for.
The threat intelligence you already pay for, in the model.
The analysis is identical at every level. What changes is how much evidence you supply — and how narrow the answer comes back.
Each capability is priced separately and attaches to any premium level — Level 3 Board-Grade and above. None attach to the free levels.
What operators ask before they quantify — the product, the levels and what they cost.
Talk to salesNo. Levels 1 and 2 run on public company data and a short questionnaire — no network feeds, no agents, nothing installed. Level 3 Board-Grade adds a 50-question control assessment and still needs no telemetry. OT network data enters only at Level 4 Evidence-Grade, for sites that already produce it.
Estimate and Baseline, Levels 1 and 2, are free and share one run allowance between them. Level 3 Board-Grade and Level 4 Evidence-Grade are premium, sold in named tiers.
Pricing is quoted rather than published, because the right tier depends on how many sites you are quantifying and how often. Talk to sales and you will get a figure against your own footprint.
FAIR and FAIR-MAM, the open standards risk teams and insurers already work to, with an OT loss model underneath them: a consequence model, zones and conduits, control evidence and threat context. Each evaluation runs 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations and returns expected loss, value at risk and a loss exceedance curve.
Whichever one your team already runs. The 50-question instrument is available in the DeRISK Control Model, NIST SP 800-82r3 and IEC 62443. You pick one — the analysis underneath is the same, so the choice is about the language your assessors already speak, not about the answer you get.
Board-Grade. Around 80% of industrial sites have no OT telemetry to share, and Board-Grade is built for exactly that case: a full control assessment, facility-level scope and the five role-based reports, with nothing to install.
Level 4 Evidence-Grade is the depth play for the instrumented minority. You can start free at Estimate or Baseline first and move up without redoing anything — the method does not change between levels.
Every result comes with a range, not a single point. The model is the same at every level. A free Level 1 Estimate rests on public data and assumptions, so its range is wide. Your answers at Level 2 and Level 3, and your sites’ OT network data at Level 4, replace those assumptions, and the range narrows.
Each evaluation runs 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, so you see the spread of possible losses, not only the expected figure.
A score ranks you. A quantification tells you how much money is at stake, at which facility, and what a given remediation is worth. The output is expected annual loss and value at risk in your own currency — a figure a CFO can put in a budget and an underwriter can price, not a letter grade.
Five reports from one assessment, each framed for the person who has to act on it: a board brief, a security posture and remediation report, a financial exposure report the CFO uses to allocate capital, an operational resilience report, and a risk transfer evidence bundle. Every one answers a single question and deliberately leaves out what that reader does not need.
All five unlock at Level 3 Board-Grade.
Separately, and à la carte. Five capabilities attach to any premium level — DeRISK Davy, the DeRISK Consultant, the DeRISK Scenario Simulator, the Threat-Intel Premium Feed and Threat-Intel: Bring Your Own. You take the ones you need and none of them is bundled into the tier price.
None attach to the free levels. And the two CTI add-ons extend the threat intelligence that ships as standard with every level, including the free ones — they never replace it.
No. The agents that run your quantification are stateless consumers of your data — nothing you supply becomes part of any model, so there is nothing learned from it to remove.
Inference runs privately inside DeNexus’ own cloud environment: outputs are not used to train or improve any model. Invocation logging is disabled in our environment, so no copies of requests or responses are created as a side effect. Your assessment persists only in DeNexus's own governed storage, where standard deletion controls apply.
Start with a free Level 1 Estimate built from public data. Add your answers for Level 3 Board-Grade and your sites’ OT network data for Level 4 Evidence-Grade: each step narrows the range around the number. DeRISK™ CRQ is available from 1 Oct 2026.